FUTURE FISHERY: Fry Monitoring Assesses Recruitment

In addition to the population survey that Idaho Fish and Game conducts every three years on the South Fork Boise River, there is also an effort to track the status of trout fry in several locations along the South Fork Boise River.

In late October a small crew was led by Art Butts from Idaho Fish and Game along with volunteers from Boise Valley Fly Fishers and the Ted Trueblood Chapter of Trout Unlimited.  They monitored trout fry in six locations spread a few miles apart.

A section of the river would be measured for a 33 meter transect.  The photo at left shows a portion of the river right (we are looking upstream so it’s on your left in the photo) portion of the South Fork just upstream of the confluence with Rough Creek.  This is just upstream of the slide area where a January 1996 landslide formed a backwater along the South Fork.

Since Art was the guy who knows what he is doing with electricity he manned the backpack electroshocking unit.  The three volunteers handled the nets, and as fry would emerge from the river bottom they would be netted and put in the five-gallon bucket.  The larger photo above shows the method.

The next step in the process was counting and measuring each of the trout that had been netted and put in the bucket.

Each trout was counted and measured with a ruler.  Total numbers are each site were recorded as were the measurements of all the fry.

The age zero trout were then put in the second bucket (both buckets held water of course) so they could avoid double counting or losing track of the number of fish.

This process was repeated for a total of six different sites.  The data collected at these sites match up with previous fry monitoring activities in years past.

Over time we hope to get a better sense of the juvenile fish populations in the South Fork Boise River and what issues they face with flow and habitat management along the river.

As lay people we were interested to see these fry are in very shallow water and for the most part on or in and among the interstices of the rocks on the bottom of the channel.  And they were right along the bank or shoreline.  In places where there was better brush cover along the bank there appeared to be more dense numbers of these little fish.  The more open areas seemed to have fewer fish.

 

 

Tagged

Triennial Trout Tracking

Idaho Fish and Game crews are this week and next undertaking their triennial fish population survey of the South Fork of the Boise River.

Photo from the 2006 electrofishing survey.

The last such survey was in the fall of 2009 when results showed a large number of smaller 100 mm or 4 inch (2 year old) trout in the system.  In fact, the numbers were very high for the small fish so it will be interesting to see if the demographic bulge makes its way through the age class distribution.

Electrofishing surveys have occurred every three years since 1994.  In previous posts we have detailed the changes observed in fish population estimates, such as number of fish per kilometer.  We have also paid attention to size distribution of the fish found in the river.

We expect the marking run to be completed this week, and the recapture run early next week.  Then the numbers will be crunched and we will begin to hear results sometime in 2013.

The netting crew look like a bunch of larcosse defenders playing with the long sticks. Photo from 2006.

UPDATE:  Additional information on the marking run at the westfly.com message board.

 

“Like an Alaska River During Salmon Spawning”

A dispatch from long-time South Fork angler Bill Eastlake:

It’s finally getting to fall fishing time! A bit of drizzle and a bit of cooler temps might make fishing better and get us out of this long hot smoky summer. Fishing in mid September on the Owyhee and South Fork was good, but it was still too warm and hazy for ideal human activity.

By the way, the South Fork looks like an Alaska river during salmon spawning season.  I believe the Zimowsky piece on kokanee above Arrowrock and below Anderson Ranch Dam seriously underestimated how many fish there are. I don’t think I had ever seen more than two or three orange kokanee in the South Fork over a weekend before this year.

Last week they were paired up in good gravel and building redds, lots of them. We counted groups of 20 or so in several spots. There were assorted few in almost every place we fished. There were dead ones floating by, marooned on shore, etc, all over the river.

One shallow area above Cow Creek that I favor at low flows for trout had so many kokanee I didn’t bother to cast for trout. There must have been at least a hundred! It was unbelievable to see so many kokanee. I guess that means good populations of salmon for Arrowrock next year, but I really thought they were “in the way” of trout fishing.

Anglers, Agency Biologists combine efforts on South Fork Stranding Study

September 4, 5 and 17 Field Outings to Observe Juvenile Trout Stranding

A year after Whitefish Ed and his fishing partner witnessed and documented some significant flow reduction stranding of South Fork Boise River juvenile trout, the Ted Trueblood Chapter of Trout Unlimited prompted, organized and collaborated with biologists from the Bureau of Reclamation (BOR) and Idaho Department of Fish and Game (IDFG) and other angler groups to better assess the problem.

September 17 stranding study. Photo credit: Mike Dougherty

The assessments occurred September 4-5 during the first flow reduction, and September 17 during the second flow drop.

As way of background, BOR routinely cuts summer flows at Anderson Ranch Dam down to 600 cfs sometime in August or September when irrigation water demands begin to be fall off.

Flows are again reduced from 600 to 300 cfs later in September, usually no earlier than September 15th.  These flow cuts are rapid and believed to have catastrophic effects on macroinvertebrates and young fish that are hugging shallow shoreline margins or living in low velocity backwaters and side channels.  Up until this year, there had been little effort to scrutinize what actually happens.

On Tuesday, September 4, BOR began cutting flows at 8 a.m. in 300 cfs increments from the summertime irrigation flow level of 1800 cfs every two hours until reaching 900 cfs at 1 p.m.  Again on the next day, and at 9 a.m., flows were reduced to 600 cfs.  These flow reductions mimicked the normal operational flow cut schedule at the dam.  A group of 1 TU and 3 IDFG biologists teamed with 5 volunteers on September 4 to observe and tally the incidence of bug and fish stranding along four different reaches of the river. 

Whitefish Ed chose to stay put at a shallow bank section below Cow Creek Bridge to watch the reaction of hundreds of juvenile trout as flow reductions showed up.  This was the location where he had observed and related significant fish stranding the year before. 

The next morning on September 5, these same biologists combined with 3 volunteers to retrace their steps and look for stranded fish when the flow was finally dropped to 600 cfs. 

Twelve days later, on Monday, September 17, a total of eight biologists with TU, BOR and IDFG teamed with about two dozen angler volunteers to be on the river when the final flow cuts were made to reach the minimum flow of 300 cfs.  In addition to Ted Trueblood Chapter members, other angler groups included the Hemingway Chapter, Boise Valley Fly Fishers, and Gem State Fly Fishers.  TU provided a night-before dinner, and on the day of the field work a light breakfast and lunch at the “camp central” location at Reclamation Village for everyone involved.  This larger group allowed for more river sections to be investigated.  The river was dropped 100 cfs at 9 a.m. and another 200 cfs at 11 a.m. 

 

RESULTS:  Right now, the jury is out.  The data collected during our two outings have not been evaluated and compiled into a report by the biologists as yet.  Each group that was deployed to the river had a person with a clipboard to write down information on stranding sites, including information such as the size of the pool (length, width and average depth), a GPS waypoint if someone in the group had such a device, and numbers and species of fish stranded.  Participants were asked to bring a digital camera, and as this article shows we created ample documentation of the event.  More than 200 photographs can be viewed here.   

Dick Frencer with Boise Valley Fly Fishers measures water depth, somewhere downstream of Cow Creek bridge. Photo Credit: John Wolter.

During the course of our on-river evaluation, many of us observed great numbers of “young of the year” juvenile trout that could be readily seen along low velocity and shallow shore line margins.  These age-0 fish (young fish that have hatched and emerged from spawning redds this last spring/summer) are said to be subject to 70 – 80% mortality in the winter ahead.  The incidence of stranding when flows are lowered is directly related to the character of the river at any specific location. 

Preliminary observations were that stranding appeared to be more catastrophic within the 600 to 300 cfs flow reduction regime as more shallow water and side channels were subjected to dewatering.  Everyone involved observed different amounts of stranding based on the specific river sections they were looking at.  Ed filed his report here.

Some of the salmonid casualties. Photo credit: Steve Boyd.

Last year, the flow cuts occurred in the darkness of early morning hours; this year flow reductions were implemented during daylight which could somehow reduce the amount of stranding.  Significant stranding of stoneflies and caddisflies were observed, indicating that these organisms cannot readily follow rapidly receding water.

A summary report of our study findings should be completed by our biologist partners later this fall.  If there is biological justification, we believe there could be opportunity to modify the BOR downramping regimes at Anderson Ranch Dam to help lower fish and insect stranding.  Next year, we may want to repeat this study using a different flow drop schedule.  Stay tuned.

Group photo after breakfast. Photo credit: Darryl Kuhrt.


The Macroinvertebrate Effects of Downramping

To help evaluate the effects of dropping flows on aquatic insects, the TU Ted Trueblood Chapter contracted with Dr. Chris Walser, Professor of Biology at College of Idaho.  C of I students are participating in the assessment.  Dr Walser’s approach focuses on the flow reduction of 600 to 300 cfs, looking at pre and post conditions.  Macroinvertebrates were collected at shallow riffle sites on Tuesday, September 11, before downramping and then again at the same locations on September 18, following the final flow cut to 300 cfs.

Big stonefly nymphs like this one were scrambling to find the water. Photo credit: Marj Dougherty

A total of 60 samples were taken.  These samples will be sorted to the lowest practical taxonomic level, enumerated and weighed.  A concluding report will be completed and provided to TU in December.  This unique scientific study should shed some significant light on losses to the macroinvertebrate community when rapid flow drops occur on the South Fork Boise River.

Flows drop after a long pull on Anderson Ranch Water

 

South Fork Boise River flows downstream of Anderson Ranch Dam

The Bureau of Reclamation began turning down the dial on the boating flows after the end of the Labor Day weekend.

By the end of Tuesday September 4th flows dropped from 1,850 cfs to 900 cfs.  On Wednesday the 5th the flows were at 600 cfs.

Summer boating flows lasted longer and were slightly higher than the typical 1,600 cfs.  In fact, the 1,800 cfs flow seems to be a “new normal.”

So why did flows stay higher through Labor Day?  Continue Reading…

Tagged ,